[clue] Can't connect to Webmin
    foo7775 at comcast.net 
    foo7775 at comcast.net
       
    Sun Feb 10 12:02:43 MST 2013
    
    
  
Thanks for the reply David. To address your questions in order: 
When I try to connect from the Win7 system, whether via browser or SSH, I'm using the IP address rather than the hostname. 
The suggestion to telnet to that machine & port was a good one, I hadn't remembered that trick. After configuring PuTTY appropriately, here's the output that it returned: 
get 
HTTP/1.0 400 Bad Request 
Server: MiniServ/1.620 
Date: <datestring> 
Content-type: text/html; Charset=iso-8859-1 
Connection: close 
<h1>Error - Bad Request</h1> 
So - it *seems* that I'm not being blocked by any kind of firewall, & perhaps I should shift my attention to the application itself... 
Thanks again for the reply! 
T. 
----- Original Message -----
From: "David L. Anselmi" <anselmi at anselmi.us> 
To: "CLUE's mailing list" <clue at cluedenver.org> 
Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2013 5:54:34 PM 
Subject: Re: [clue] Can't connect to Webmin 
foo7775 at comcast.net wrote: 
> 
> I am able to SSH from the Win7 desktop to the CentOS VM using PuTTY, login& all other functions 
> behave as expected; 
Did you use the same host name for SSH and HTTP (obviously for HTTP you have to specify the port 
correctly too)? 
> PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION 
> 10000/tcp open http MiniServ 1.620 (Webmin httpd) 
> |_http-favicon: Unknown favicon MD5: 9A2006C267DE04E262669D821B57EAD1 
> |_http-git: 0 
> |_http-methods: No Allow or Public header in OPTIONS response (status code 200) 
> | http-robots.txt: 1 disallowed entry 
> |_/ 
> |_http-title: Login to Webmin 
> | ndmp-version: 
> |_ ERROR: Failed to get host information from server 
> 
> To *me*, it still feels like there's a firewall in the mix somewhere (although the 'http-title: 
> Login to Webmin' output above would *seem* to argue against that). Since I'm not too familiar 
> with iptables, is it possible that it's still affecting the situation? What am I 
> forgetting/overlooking? 
You could still have iptables rules active (stopping the service doesn't necessarily unblock all the 
ports). But I doubt it. See what telnet tells you if you do a get from the Windows 7 box. 
Dave _______________________________________________ 
clue mailing list: clue at cluedenver.org 
For information, account preferences, or to unsubscribe see: 
http://cluedenver.org/mailman/listinfo/clue 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://cluedenver.org/pipermail/clue/attachments/20130210/c7101321/attachment.html 
    
    
More information about the clue
mailing list