[CLUE-Talk] RFI packet log deny message
B O'Fallon
bof at pcisys.net
Tue Oct 23 22:22:54 MDT 2001
Hello,
I was looking at my root mail tonight and noticed the following:
Oct 23 21:56:11 mudhen kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0
PROTO=6
152.2.210.121:20 10.0.0.3:32897 L=60 S=0x00 I=21355 F=0x4000
T=51 SYN
(#59)
Oct 23 21:56:20 mudhen kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0
PROTO=6
152.2.210.121:20 10.0.0.3:32897 L=60 S=0x00 I=41627 F=0x4000
T=51 SYN
(#59)
Oct 23 21:56:32 mudhen kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0
PROTO=6
152.2.210.121:20 10.0.0.3:32897 L=60 S=0x00 I=3142 F=0x4000
T=51 SYN
(#59)
nslookup revealed that 152.2.210.121 is latinhouse.metalab.unc.edu. I
wasn't doing anything with them that I know of.
10.0.0.3 is address assigned to my ethernet card by the NAT feature of
my Cisco 675.
Could someone explain what this is? Is someone at unc probing the ftp
port of the ipaddress for my cisco and it is getting passed through to
the firewall I am running on 10.0.0.3?
Thanx.
BOF
Received: from mclean.mail.mindspring.net (mclean.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.57])
by clue.denver.co.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA05446
for <clue-talk at clue.denver.co.us>; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 05:20:03 -0600
Received: from dell-laptop (user-33qtohj.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.226.51])
by mclean.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA18963;
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 07:42:54 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200110241142.HAA18963 at mclean.mail.mindspring.net>
X-Sender: bsanders at scribble-count.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 05:43:38 -0700
To: DenverTwo at topica.com, clue list <clue-talk at clue.denver.co.us>
From: Bill Sanders <bsanders at scribble-count.com>
In-Reply-To: <0.1600005229.1411080509-738719082-1003915386 at topica.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: [CLUE-Talk] Re: SSSCA
Sender: clue-talk-admin at clue.denver.co.us
Errors-To: clue-talk-admin at clue.denver.co.us
X-BeenThere: clue-talk at clue.denver.co.us
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta2
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: clue-talk at clue.denver.co.us
List-Id: CLUE non-technical discussions. <clue-talk.clue.denver.co.us>
In last week's issue (10/15) of InfoWorld, Russell Pavlicek (one of their
new columnists, so I haven't gotten a "feel" for how restrained or racy he
tends to be), says that it was a good idea which got out of hand. (But he
also says there's a complementary proposal in front of the W3C which also
overdoes it concerning the same issue: rights content producers vs open
source.
In any event, it's not the privacy threats that Microsoft and the DoD are
pushing.
bill
Bill Sanders, partner in Scribble & Count(tm) LLC (www.scribble-count.com),
a Colorado-based information services company specializing in hypertext.
S&C has clients and speaking engagements nationwide. Bill is also Dir Info
Mgmt for Technology Extension Consulting, Inc. (www.tecslt.com), a
Houston-based mobile IT troubleshooting team.
______
At 02:23 AM 10/24/01 , bill ehlert wrote:
>
>
>
>
> In some circles, there's a lot of
>concern about a piece of prospective
>legislation called Security Systems
>Standards and Certification Act (SSSCA).
>
> Some contend it is necessary to
>protect intellectual property, and for
>other reasons.
>
> Some contend it would criminalize
>open-source software.
>
> The Association for Computing Machinery
>has written a letter to Senator Hollings
>about it:
>
>http://www.eff.org/IP/SSSCA/20010926_usacm_hollings_letter.html
>
>
> A search on Google turned up 19,200
>related pages, so there's plenty of
>information about it available:
>
>http://www.google.com/search?q=SSSCAbtnG=Google+Search
>
> Anybody got any thoughts on the matter???
>
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
>http://personals.yahoo.com
>
>
>to unsubscribe, or to subscribe (you can pass
>this along to your friends), visit:
>
>http://www.topica.com/lists/DenverTwo/prefs
>
>anyone trying this must login to topica
>first; and anyone not yet a topica member
>must become one (it's relatively quick and
>easy, and safe, i think)
>
>==^================================================================
>EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrCB7.bUMk3d
>Or send an email To: DenverTwo-unsubscribe at topica.com
>This email was sent to: bsanders at scribble-count.com
>
>T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
>http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
>==^================================================================
>
Received: from web12106.mail.yahoo.com (web12106.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.26])
by clue.denver.co.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id DAA05174
for <clue-talk at clue.denver.co.us>; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 03:00:09 -0600
Message-ID: <20011024092302.25512.qmail at web12106.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [65.101.236.91] by web12106.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 02:23:02 PDT
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 02:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: bill ehlert <bill_ehlert at yahoo.com>
To: clue list <clue-talk at clue.denver.co.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: [CLUE-Talk] SSSCA
Sender: clue-talk-admin at clue.denver.co.us
Errors-To: clue-talk-admin at clue.denver.co.us
X-BeenThere: clue-talk at clue.denver.co.us
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta2
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: clue-talk at clue.denver.co.us
List-Id: CLUE non-technical discussions. <clue-talk.clue.denver.co.us>
In some circles, there's a lot of
concern about a piece of prospective
legislation called Security Systems
Standards and Certification Act (SSSCA).
Some contend it is necessary to
protect intellectual property, and for
other reasons.
Some contend it would criminalize
open-source software.
The Association for Computing Machinery
has written a letter to Senator Hollings
about it:
http://www.eff.org/IP/SSSCA/20010926_usacm_hollings_letter.html
A search on Google turned up 19,200
related pages, so there's plenty of
information about it available:
http://www.google.com/search?q=SSSCA&btnG=Google+Search
Anybody got any thoughts on the matter???
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
Received: from web12106.mail.yahoo.com (web12106.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.26])
by clue.denver.co.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id DAA05174
for <clue-talk at clue.denver.co.us>; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 03:00:09 -0600
Message-ID: <20011024092302.25512.qmail at web12106.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [65.101.236.91] by web12106.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 02:23:02 PDT
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 02:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: bill ehlert <bill_ehlert at yahoo.com>
To: clue list <clue-talk at clue.denver.co.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: [CLUE-Talk] SSSCA
Sender: clue-talk-admin at clue.denver.co.us
Errors-To: clue-talk-admin at clue.denver.co.us
X-BeenThere: clue-talk at clue.denver.co.us
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta2
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: clue-talk at clue.denver.co.us
List-Id: CLUE non-technical discussions. <clue-talk.clue.denver.co.us>
In some circles, there's a lot of
concern about a piece of prospective
legislation called Security Systems
Standards and Certification Act (SSSCA).
Some contend it is necessary to
protect intellectual property, and for
other reasons.
Some contend it would criminalize
open-source software.
The Association for Computing Machinery
has written a letter to Senator Hollings
about it:
http://www.eff.org/IP/SSSCA/20010926_usacm_hollings_letter.html
A search on Google turned up 19,200
related pages, so there's plenty of
information about it available:
http://www.google.com/search?q=SSSCA&btnG=Google+Search
Anybody got any thoughts on the matter???
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
More information about the clue-talk
mailing list